Latest News
Archived News
Mission
FAQ
Current Projects
Projects Map
Financial Info
Our People
Related Links
Membership
Project Gifts
Tribute Gifts
Gifts of Land
Bequests
Advocacy
Volunteers
Donate Now
About Membership
Member Benefits
Join Today
Office Information
Staff Contacts
Articles
Iowa conservationists
Other online publications
Eagle Nest Diaries
Get outdoors
Upcoming Events
Featured Destinations
Outdoor Guide
Iowa Trails
Visit INHF Projects
Permanent Land
   Protection
Land Management
INHF Magazines
Annual Report
INHF Books
INHF wall calendar
About Internships
Intern Testimonials
How to Apply



Iowa's trout hook anglers & conservationists
by Bill Kalishek


Note: This article was first published in the Spring 2005 edition of INHF's quarterly magazine.


If there is a fish that can capture people’s imagination, it has to be the trout. The intense blood-red color on the belly of our native brook trout or the orange-red margin of the adipose fin of a brown trout make them some of the most beautiful of all fish. Their beauty, coupled with the quality of the streams where they choose to live, make trout a favorite of both anglers and conservationists.

What trout want

Trout distribution is limited in Iowa by water temperature and general stream health.

Trout generally don’t survive in water greater than 75 degrees, while most Iowa waters top 80 degrees by late summer. However, water emerging from northeast Iowa springs stays at about 50 degrees year-round. Streams fed by these springs have water cold enough to support trout for a distance that is dependent on the size and number of supporting springs.

Early warnings

It’s hard to say which Iowa streams historically hosted trout because their population decline was already noticeable when biologist Seth Meek conducted Iowa’s first comprehensive fisheries inventories in the early 1890s. He noted several former trout habitats, such as the Upper Iowa River, where anglers reported they were no longer finding trout.

Meek attributed the declining trout populations to the loss of native prairie, which had naturally slowed and filtered stream flows while reducing cyclical flow variations. He added, “The breaking of the native sod for agricultural purposes has especially affected the smaller streams in this respect, while the construction of ditches and the practice of underdraining have had their effects upon the larger ones. Moreover the constant loosening of the soil, in farming, tends to reduce it to that condition in which it is readily transported by the heavy rains to produce muddy currents. To this cause, no doubt, is due the present absence of trout from many of the streams of northeastern Iowa and their marked decrease in other parts of the State.”

Early responses

Even before Meek’s reports, Iowa’s human population was responding to our declining fish populations. The first state fish hatchery was constructed in 1873 on the Wapsipinicon River in Anamosa, and its primary function was to produce salmon and trout for stocking in Iowa waters.

Unfortunately, some of the earliest fish stockings in Iowa put coldwater species into waters that we now know were too warm to support them, such as stocking Penobscot salmon into Clear Lake in 1876.

Throughout the latter half of the 1800s, many species of trout and salmon were stocked in Iowa. In the process, two additional trout species, neither of which is native to Iowa, became established here (see species sidebar).

Recent responses

Iowa’s current trout populations are beset by many of the same environmental problems they faced in 1892—especially excessive silt loads and increased water delivery into streams.

However, over the last 20 years, populations of naturally-reproducing wild trout have increased as a result of several factors. The combination of improved land use in the watersheds draining into the streams and the land use immediately along the streams has led to improved physical characteristics in the stream itself.

Soil eroding into streams and the increased nutrients that often go with the soil have a large impact on trout populations. Conservation programs and conservation management practices have greatly reduced the amount of soil and nutrients entering trout streams. Stream bank stabilization has also reduced the amount of these materials.

The proper management of the watershed and riparian zone results in a cleaner stream with a higher amount of clean gravel and rock substrate. This produces quality spawning areas for trout and greater diversity and higher numbers of aquatic insects, the primary food of trout. Improvements in the in-stream habitat needed by trout mean more places for trout to hide and live.

All these efforts have resulted in the increased success of spawning trout in our northeast Iowa streams and more wild trout populations.

If Seth Meek were here 110 years later to repeat his study, he’d have some better news to report.

For more information see related pages: Iowa's trout species, Trout reproduction, and South Pine Creek: A habitat success story or visit http://www.iowadnr.com/fish/fishing/trout/troutstr.html

 

Bill Kalishek is a Fisheries Biologist with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources.

 

Top of Page

© Copyright 2009 Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation
Comments? Suggestions? Email INHF Webmaster